Happy Hacker Digest April 17-18, 1997
This is a moderated list for discussions
of *legal* hacking.
Moderator: Matt Hinze
Send posts to: email@example.com (Matt Hinze)
[if you can, include a "HH"
in the subject header]
Please don't send us anything you wouldn't
email to your friendly neighborhood narc, OK?
To subscribe or
unsubscribe, use the subscribe boxes on the menu bars, please..
If you decide you just want to use the forum and not get these
mailings, we promise our feelings won't get hurt if you unsubscribe
from this list.
H a p p y h a c k i
n g !
URL of the day: http://www.cs.utexas.edu/matt/hh.html
Table of Contents:
* Happy Hacker Digest Webpage
* No Longer Unsecured Telnet Port
* Anonymous Remailers
* Which Tool for the Job?
* Sheel Account
* IP Spoofing, etc..
* mIRC Email Spoofing Update (Correction)
* Linux Security in IP Masquerade (Comments)
* More on mesg [y|n|?]
* REMOTE Vulnerability in PHP/FI
* Port 21
*** Happy Hacker Digest Webpage
I have set up a Happy Hacker Digest Webpage at
http://www.cs.utexas.edu/matt/hh.html. The HH Webpage contains links
to sites discussed in recent issues of the digest, "URLs Of The Day",
and a link to k1netik's Happy Hacker Digest Archive. Expect updates
the day after the most recent digest is sent out. If you have
suggestions or questions regarding the webpage, send them to me, at
firstname.lastname@example.org. Check it out!
*** No Longer Unsecured Telnet Port
From: "Mark Obrembalski" <email@example.com>
> I was probing a subnet 206.***.021 for other assigned IP addresses
> got 30 hits. I telneted to the first one which was 206.***.021.065
> (postnet1.accessnv.com). To my surprise, I connected to this machine
> without a USER ID or password!
> This organization's computer appears to have a security hole you could
> drive a VW bus through. (May not last long once all you 'happy
> hackers' drop in for a visit.)
When I tried to connect, the telnet port of 126.96.36.199 wanted a
password but no ID. The telnet ports of the following IP-numbers were
closed. *.*.*.72,75,80-94 seemed to be totally down.
On the web site www.accessnv.com, they write something about some
changes and repairs to be done this weekend. Could it be possible,
that you just went in when some security was switched off for
repairing purposes or anything like that?
On 188.8.131.52, port 80 is open with a HTTP 1.0 server. Netscape
doesn't show anything but an image icon with a
big "?" on it. Is it possible to send commands to the server by
Mark Obrembalski, Eichenstr.107, 26131 Oldenburg
Schienerbergstr.4, 78315 Radolfzell
Anrufen zwecklos, Mail geht schneller.
*** Anonymous Remailers
From: John <firstname.lastname@example.org>
looking for any info on anonymous remailers -- those friendly services
that you send mail to, and then they send it on to its destination
after stripping pertinent header information (thereby making it near
impossible to track the letter to you).
NO no no, I'm not going to spam or otherwise annoy people. I
want to be able to send mail from work without revealing my last name.
[Matt: Let me refer you to the Raph Levien's Anonymous Remailers
webpage at http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~raph/remailer-list.html, it has
just about everything you will need.]
*** Which Tool For the Job?
From: Shapr <email@example.com>
Personally, I'd like to see more hacking tools locations.
I've learned much from figuring out netcat from the l0pht
tools. Of course, tracert and nslookup. I've enjoyed
nbtstat under Win95 for playing with NetBEUI stuff on the
same wire as my machine. Also, check pwdump and the Crack
5.0 modified for NT passwords and PWDump output.
There's a nifty NetBIOS program that checks for idiotic
passwords on any machine reachable with NetBIOS (as far I
understand NetBIOS is non-routable, gotta be on the same
wire) hmm, where did I put that one? My current project
is SNMP, I'd love to hear more about the weaknesses in it.
I'm not picky about which platform I use for investigating
I equally use Unix, Win95, Win3.1, MacOS 7.5.5, whatever.
If you want to learn lots fast, try subscribing to BugTraq
NTBugTraq, of course this list :)
I do have a silly question thatI've never quite figured out
the answer to, how do you grab all the DNS names for a
certain domain? such as *.cmu.edu how do you find this?
I think it's hiding in nslookup, since I can find out
*.myuniversity.edu by doing ls myuniversity.edu
but I don't know how to switch the domain I'm using.
*** Shell Acocunt
From: ".o0ORSNAKEO0o." <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> when I use uname, it says SunOS, but when I telnet to localhost, it
> SystemV. What is this?
> Carolyn: Congratulations, you have a shell account. But I am puzzled
> why telnet localhost (same as telnet 127.0.0.1) gives you a different
> operating system. Anyone have ideas?
I saw something similar on a remote ISP. I telneted there
it gave me a really old version of slackware, and then uname revealed
that it was the newest version. The security admin hid what the
version was so that people would use out-dated attacks on the IPS, in
an attempt to halt specific hackers. He also did this by modifying
sendmail and a couple other commonly used exploitable programs.
way you can do another check is by going to
It should tell you the type of box you are running (if it matches with
SunOS or SystemV you know which one it is). Hope that helps!
*** Ip Spoofing, etc.
From: "IO Scream" <email@example.com>
1> What has happened to Silicon Toad's Site?
[Matt: Evidently it's being moved. Try the Austrailian mirror at
2> OK... I have a good topic for the next GTMHH. How about
Introduction to IP Spoofing"? I have heard a lot of talk about
understand TCP/IP and its purpose but I am confused as to how to send
a packet with a "faked" header. I do _NOT_ want to know the website
some hacker who has graciously written some click button program to
this for me. I want to understand it.
[Matt: There is a text on IP Spoofing at Bronc Buster's New Buckaroos
Page, which can be found at:
Thank you for your time...
IOScream -----------------> Faster than a speeding electron!
*** mIRC Email Spoofing Update (Correction)
From: pc2000 <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Well after I posted my spoof on sending email via mirc I got quite
few emails telling me it didnt work, I looked at the code and I forgot
to add one thing. SO below is the right code that will work.
Here it is:
raw -q privmsg $me :
DCC CHAT CHAT $$1 $$2 $+
/long /echo 6 $longip( $$1 )
Copy and paste it directly as I have it here cause the little box
makes a difference. Try it now it will work. you will dcc chat
yourself, accept it and follow my instructions from my last post.
PS. I also got emails sayn "mail command don't work" Well you have
paste my lines of code into your alias section in mirc to use the
/mail command. Have fun and email me if it don't work right (maybe
word wrapping in yer email program screws up my code so it looks
different) If that is the case I will email anyone who asks me a text
file with it all instead.
[Matt: Thanks for the update.]
*** LINUX SECURITY BUG IN IP Masquerade (Update)
From: email@example.com (P. Murgatroyd)
>LINUX SECURITY BUG IN IP Masquerade
>A problem exists in IP Masquerade under Linux which allows traffic
>be passed to external networks even after the gateway host has been
>been successfully stopped. In reality, the connection in question
>totally unaffected by the system shutdown.
More info from od^phreak. Wouldnt it be nice if he actually credited
the person who posted this to the sneakers/dc-stuff/bugtraq list two
days ago (cant remember which list I recieved it from or from who).
not crediting anyone else, he is makeing it look like he found it out
and is revealing it to the public.
*** Response to Warpy's Advice (In HHD 4/16/97)
From: "BeAvEr" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
This is BeAvEr. I was reading the April 16 GTMHH, and was "ROTFL"
when I read Warpy's comments towards the "Newbie Community" Shame
you Warpy, for being so rash and predejust (Excuse the Spelling)
towards a community of newbies you have never met and assume to know.
God-forbid if I am not as intelligent as you are. And God-forbid
can't have one ounze of empathy towards people who aren't as
experienced as you. If you haven't figured it out yet, Warpy,
a rolemodel. All the newbies look up to people like you.
what you have; knowledge and experience. But instead of helping
instead of being friendly. You pull out a torch and we end up
discouraged w/third degree burns.
Beyond all the expectations of how you "should" treat newbies, you
should realize that we are ALL individuals. We shouldn't get flamed
for asking a question YOU know the answer too. There are always
ways of finding out infomation. But if you know the answer, why
it harder. Why make something hard when it has the possiblity
being easy. Warpy, can you honestly expect every newbie to install
Linux, when they don't even know what it is.
It is crazy to think that this is what boils down too. Bitter
who flame newbies for asking questions. I know I am trying.
I get an
E for effort. I want knowledge, and I shouldn't have to worry
who to ask for it Wheither we use Windows, Linux, VMX, or any other
O/S, we are still aiming towards the same goals. If anything we
should help each other. That is what this list was started for.
praise the GTMHH. It has helped me fa beyond what I ever asked
And my sastisfaction comes with knowing that I did with all the
"Elite" hackers laughing in my face. With your knowledge comes
responsibility. You should learn to harness it, instead of abusing
[Matt: I think that Warpy was actually trying to help the newbie
community. By finding out information on your own, you retain it (plus
you learn other stuff in finding out what you originally wanted to
know!), as opposed to just being told, or having someone else do it
From: Dave Weir <DWeir@NFA.Futures.Org>
Having read the 4/16 HH digest I have to agree with Warpy about silly
(dumb) questions that are being fielded by some of the readers.
I have started hacking, and started getting the digest I have had to
laugh at some of the questions that posted and asked. Warpy is
in regards to the amount of information that is asked for by ppl.
Yahoo and AltaVista weren't developed for the hell of it. Use
Many times I have been temped to ask questions in this forum, but have
thought against it because I can find what I'm looking for faster
through the search engines. There is so much information out there
that it is overwhelming. It might take some time to find what
looking for, but its there.
What I enjoy about the HH digests are the hacks that people find and
share, or the insight of security or other issues that are faced by
the computer world. I'm not asking for a sessacation (sp) the
questions, just that ppl take the time to research the internet first,
if you cant find then post the question. But only after you have
exhausted all the resources that are available to you.
From: Warpy <email@example.com>
>(Carolyn: Warpy, all us people who enjoy legal hacking are happy to
>identify ourselves and help others to learn. True, recently it has
>become a big deal among certain elements of the hacker world to
>believe that if something is legal, it isn't real hacking. I say
>"pooh" to them.)
Hrmm.. Carolyn, I LOVE legal hacking, there is nothing more fun than
busting root on Leprekon's box when he calls himself a "unix security
consultant". Mind you however his OVERALL knowledge is heaps better
than mine and in all honesty, i'm not much more than an exploit kiddy.
Though I have made an effort recently to learn to code.
Another thing. I have always made it clear to newbies that I will help
them to learn, however I have also made it clear that I will NOT
spoon-feed them. They MUST use their brains first. If they come onto
#hackers at infowar asking: "how do i hack a web page" i feel the urge
to shout, rant, rave, and throw things at them, because there is SOOO
much you need to know before you can even contemplate hacking a web
page. You would need to know the system which is hosting the web pages
OS, you would need to know and understand how that particular OS
works, then you would need to know both remote and internal exploits
and how to clean up your tracks once your done. Answering all that is
just a tad too much for one person, especially when you can collect
most of that info from the net itself.
In regards to improving security. I would be very interested
(philosophical question approaching) to see just how many of these
raving fanatical newbies out there actually read this to see how they
can "improve their security" rather than how they can bust past the
security. See, I believe most of them are more interested in the
breaking of security than the improvment of it. I myself have more
recently been looking into "why" the exploits work and how to protect
my own system from it, whereas b4 all i used to be was an exploit
kiddy running around phf'ing every bloody system i could find, and
getting root with exploits written by other people, which I had NO
understanding of how they worked. I however now recognise this as lame
newbiesh behaviour, and am currently trying to rectify that.
Perhaps if you could espouse this kinda attitude to the readership,
which you already do to a point. And bring out the darn intermediate
A great hack is accomplished before it has begun...
(paraphrased from Sun Tzu) -[firstname.lastname@example.org]-
[Matt: I know I've heard enough of this argument. :) Keep this in
mind: Before you post a question to the Happy Hacker Digest, try to
type in your subject in Yahoo! or AltaVista. However, if you think
it's something a lot of people want to know, send it, and if I agree,
I'll make sure it gets read/answered. :)]
*** More On mesg [y|n|?] Stuff
From: Argent <Argent1@post1.com>
If you really want to send a message to someone on the same system
that you're on but they have mesg n, you can still send them a
message. first do a who -Hu|more (-H for headers, -u for extra
and the |more so that you can take your time scrolling through it) and
look down the first column until you find the login of the person you
want to send a message to. Then look over to the next column on
right (the "line" column). this tells you how the person is connected
to the computer. it should be tty?? where ?? should be some
alphanumeric. Because Unix and its flavors are SO nifty, there
symbolic links to all the possible devices that people could be
connected to the computer with. They're in /dev and appear as
of the same name as the device. the way they work is that anything
that you try to save to the files goes to the device and anything you
try to read from the file comes in from the device's input. So
redirect a banner into /dev/ttyd11 by typing $banner HAPPY BIRFDAY >
/dev/ttyd11 anyone connected to the computer through ttyd11 will get
nice big messege saying HAPPY BIRFDAY. This lets you do all sorts
fun stuff like $echo You have mail in /users/mail/[login] >
/dev/tty??. When they start their mail reader, however, they'll
dissappointed with an empty inbox. I've seen code for a program
will sit in memory and wait for a particular person to log on.
they so, it'll grep a who command for their login name and find
the tty?? they're on and send a backspace to their tty every minute.
And I've even seen a program that reads from the tty after prompting
someone to type their password in again. So there's all sorts
you can have.
Even the paranoid have enemies.
[Matt: Elite hackers hardly have time to annoy people like this. We
need to eat and stuff after a night of coding. :) ]
*** REMOTE Vulnerability in PHP/FI
From: [As seen on the BUGTRAQ mailing list. To subscribe to Bugtraq,
send an email message to email@example.com with "subscribe
bugtraq" in the message body.]
[DiS] Advisory 97-347.1
Issue date: April 16, 1997
Topic: REMOTE Vulnerability in PHP/FI
A vulnerability has been found by DiS in PHP/FI, a NCSA httpd cgi
enhancment. This vulnerability allows unauthorized users to view
arbitrary file contents on the machine running httpd by sending the
file name wishing to be displayed as the QUERY_STRING.
simply use any web browser to send the following URL:
Note: this exploit has not been tested on a system that
PHP/FI as an apache
module. This information may or may not
be applicable on such
Remote, unauthorized users can view arbitrary file
contents on the
system with the same privileges as the httpd (HTTP
The author has propsed the following sollution:
>> ...The workaround is to set the following in php.h
>> #define PATTERN_RESTRICT ".*\\.phtml$"
>> This will limit the php.cgi parser to only display files ending in
>> The exact same adviasory applies to any other parser someone might
>> to stick in their cgi-bin directory. This is in no way specific
>> You can also avoid the problem by using either CGI redirection or
>> by using the Apache module version.
The current PHP/FI distribution may be obtained from
J-Man Th' Shaman [DiGiTAL iNFORMATiON SOCiETY]
*** Port 21
Please post from anonymous..
While port scanning I found an interesting thing.
When I telneted to port 21 I was presented a prompt. When I typed in
the name of an ISP it forwarded me to it. What exactly is the purpose
of the service?
Matt Hinze <firstname.lastname@example.org>